COVID-19 vaccine data, context, and consequences
Facebook is cautioning against viewing information containing reported C-19 vaccine side effects/injuries without context by providing the linked article below from “health feedback . Org” which states, “...reports of adverse events in people who received COVID-19 vaccines don’t demonstrate that these events were caused by the vaccines.”
As long as the articles can still be viewed, I will not see it as censorship. When access/materials are removed entirely by media platforms/big tech, then it certainly is censorship, as we have often seen by the removal of content by YouTube. That is problematic on many levels.
The VAERS https://vaers.hhs.gov/ website’s archived self and professionals’ reports of vaccine side effects or injuries are critical, and represent the first shots across the bow for issues with specific vaccines that may ultimately be shown as causal, resulting in those vaccines being removed from the marketplace.
Vaccines are normally vetted for years before coming on the market. Now we are faced with vaccines placed on the market months after their development, and VAERS report data is complicated to access for most people. Wouldn’t you want to know what is being reported as injuries/side effects for vaccines marketed months after development before you, your 95 year old grandmother, or your child receives it? Granted, it’s too early to confirm the injuries/side effects have a causal relationship, but why cover up raw data that could take years to research, if people want to consider what is being reported before deciding to take a vaccine? Isn’t that a right? Or is that information only for those with the special knowledge and expertise needed to circumnavigate the esoteric nuances of the VAERS site?
By virtue of covering up and hiding the raw data that may well ultimately be shown to have a causal relationship or suspending accounts of those who provide such information, media/big tech effectively creates a “collateral damage class,” so additional deaths or injuries that occur might be said to be a direct result of media/big tech interfering with platform access to raw data collected by a verified agency and shared by others, thus impairing the right of informed consent by depriving the public of shared current data on the larger more accessible platforms.
Link to the article Facebook uses for context:
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/vaers-reports-alone-dont-demonstrate-that-the-covid-19-vaccines-caused-adverse-events-evidence-does-not-indicate-vaccines-caused-bells-palsy-and-deaths/
As long as the articles can still be viewed, I will not see it as censorship. When access/materials are removed entirely by media platforms/big tech, then it certainly is censorship, as we have often seen by the removal of content by YouTube. That is problematic on many levels.
The VAERS https://vaers.hhs.gov/ website’s archived self and professionals’ reports of vaccine side effects or injuries are critical, and represent the first shots across the bow for issues with specific vaccines that may ultimately be shown as causal, resulting in those vaccines being removed from the marketplace.
Vaccines are normally vetted for years before coming on the market. Now we are faced with vaccines placed on the market months after their development, and VAERS report data is complicated to access for most people. Wouldn’t you want to know what is being reported as injuries/side effects for vaccines marketed months after development before you, your 95 year old grandmother, or your child receives it? Granted, it’s too early to confirm the injuries/side effects have a causal relationship, but why cover up raw data that could take years to research, if people want to consider what is being reported before deciding to take a vaccine? Isn’t that a right? Or is that information only for those with the special knowledge and expertise needed to circumnavigate the esoteric nuances of the VAERS site?
By virtue of covering up and hiding the raw data that may well ultimately be shown to have a causal relationship or suspending accounts of those who provide such information, media/big tech effectively creates a “collateral damage class,” so additional deaths or injuries that occur might be said to be a direct result of media/big tech interfering with platform access to raw data collected by a verified agency and shared by others, thus impairing the right of informed consent by depriving the public of shared current data on the larger more accessible platforms.
Link to the article Facebook uses for context:
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/vaers-reports-alone-dont-demonstrate-that-the-covid-19-vaccines-caused-adverse-events-evidence-does-not-indicate-vaccines-caused-bells-palsy-and-deaths/
Comments